Print Story Beep bleep chimney
Diary
By yicky yacky (Thu Nov 23, 2006 at 03:33:35 PM EST) memory, Chris Rock, Aristocrats, MOTW, monkeys (all tags)

The once-a-week bulletin you've come to ... expect.



Tanks for the memory

If your memory [RAM] consists of:

  • 1 x 2 GB stick
  • 1 x 1 GB stick
  • 1 x 512 MB stick
  • 1 x 256 MB stick

Which one do you suppose would have the bad segments?

Yup; you'd be right.

Part of me was thinking that you could end up going round in probabilistic circles: Is it 1/4, for example, or memInStick/totalMem?

It doesn't matter, though: Sod's Law always takes precedence.

 

-=+=-

 

What ah've been watching

[Most of the links in this section are definitely not safe for work, or perhaps even the home]

A friend loaned me his copy of Chris Rock's last HBO video, 'Never Scared' (safe) [*cough* (not safe) ... youtube ... ], and we watched it last weekend. Very funny in parts; not so resonant in others. The politics bits were hit-and-miss, although the section on political partisanship was very timely.

In an odd bit of synchronicity, the kids down the road have started blasting obnoxious Lil Jon crunk records (don't even think about it) instead of their usual happy hardcore. It just went to highlight the entire (pretty damned funny) "indefensibility of modern rap music" segment from Rock's show. They've got a pretty decent bounce, though (which is their only real selling point so I guess they ought to have ...)

Overall: Worth seeing if you have a high tolerance for bad language.

I also taped the showing of 'The Aristocrats' [IMDB (safe)] on FilmFour. I'm a sucker for documentaries and had heard a lot of things about it.

It's essentially a case study of the so-called "world's most dirty joke", put together by Paul Provenza and Penn Jillette (of Penn and Teller). In it, they interview numerous comedians about: the joke's appeal (or lack thereof); delivery techniques; its evolution; attempts at its subversion or improvement; what it tells you about the person telling it, and numerous other angles.

The joke itself runs like this (you've probably heard it):

A man walks into a theatrical agent's office and says, "I've got just the act for you".

The agent, needing a hit, says "Great. Tell me what you do. Describe your act."

The man says, "It's a family act — myself, my wife, my two children — and what happens is ... he proceeds to describe an essentially-unimportant torrent of complete filth ... and then we take a bow."

"Jesus Christ", says the agent, "And what's the name of this act?"

The man replies with a flourish: "The Aristocrats"

While the premise is initially interesting, its execution leaves you wondering whether the idea's actually as good as it first sounds. Numerous people trailed as being in it (the aforementioned Rock, Eddie Izzard, Eric Idle to name three) don't contribute much except to say that it's a shit joke for various, brief reasons. You're left with the impression that perhaps, really, the initial premise is all there is to say about it and the film feels like it's treading water, looking for padding, from about the fifteenth minute onwards.

Particularly dissonant is the way many of the comedians talk about a definitive performance of the joke by Gilbert Gottfried at a function shortly after September the eleventh and about its cathartic effect that night. Maybe it was cathartic, but Gilbert's delivery in the footage they show of that performance isn't even as funny as his own delivery performed for the documentary in an empty boardroom or dining room somewhere.

It's not a terrible film, and there are one or two funny moments, but it was more interesting as a critical study of the character of stand-up comedians than as a hilarious exposition of a joke. I guess I couldn't really see why people get offended at it any more, although many do, according to the reports of a friend from London who said people were walking out of the advanced showings, shouting "Obscenity!". I hope they had some fun.

Overall: There are worse ways to spend 90 minutes but it doesn't deserve its reputation.

 

-=+=-

 

Take me to the Mountain

Yes, biznatches; just when you thought it had gone, it's back.

Identify this sucker:

Answers tomorrow.

 

-=+=-

 

Choonz

I've got a nice, but strange, break running for the MFC. Looks like I'll have to break out the tin whistle again; I've got the killerest TV theme in mind to run over it, too - and it'll definitely go.

< Girls, Guns | BBC White season: 'Rivers of Blood' >
Beep bleep chimney | 18 comments (18 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback
wild guess by 256 (4.00 / 1) #1 Thu Nov 23, 2006 at 04:04:03 PM EST
Aconcagua

can't think of any other mountains that are exactly 1 Aconcagua high.
---
I don't think anyone's ever really died from smoking. --ni


Heh by yicky yacky (2.00 / 0) #2 Thu Nov 23, 2006 at 04:14:08 PM EST

The scale's a bit deceptive in that the mountain portrayed doesn't go all the way to eleven Aconcagua. It touches the red zone, but isn't [255,0,0] etc.

While I'm not taking them that seriously (and they're really just excuses to piss about with DED and link to awesome photographs in the revelation segment), I'm trying to avoid the case where the mountains take up the full range of the scale and then people just go looking for mountains of that exact height.


----
24 days left ...
[ Parent ]

I saw the Aristocrats at a small theatre in by cam (4.00 / 1) #3 Thu Nov 23, 2006 at 04:21:31 PM EST
Reston when it came out, mainly at my wife's bidding. I didn't think it was very funny either though it had it's moments. Bob Saget was the pick, I saw it on Cinemax or HBO recently and watched part of it but it didn't hold my attention when I had a remote in my hand.

cam
Freedom, liberty, equity and an Australian Republic


I'll guess . . . by slozo (4.00 / 1) #4 Thu Nov 23, 2006 at 08:01:28 PM EST
 . . . hell, if they're posting Aconcagua as the high end of the scale, it must be on the same continent. And it looks close, so next highest I think is the one by La Paz, Bolivia . . . (pause, as I look on my map) . . .

. . . montaña Illimani.



Nope by yicky yacky (2.00 / 0) #7 Fri Nov 24, 2006 at 04:50:06 AM EST

Interesting guess, though.


----
24 days left ...
[ Parent ]

so it's tomorrow . . . by slozo (2.00 / 0) #17 Fri Nov 24, 2006 at 07:42:23 PM EST
. . . and the answer is . . .?

[ Parent ]

sod's law by martingale (4.00 / 1) #5 Fri Nov 24, 2006 at 03:47:36 AM EST
it's often like self inflicted, you know? Let's say you're eyeing that 2GB stick and you're thinking "hey I want me some of that now", and of course you'd look at the price and think "bastards" and you'd ye olde shoppe on thar intarnet, arr! for the cheaper manufacturer ("bargain!") and you'd be like "yay!" at first and then you'd be like "oh sod!" but say you were _also_ eyeing that 256MB stick and you'd be "meh, might as well" and you wouldn't look twice at the price cause "it's cheap, ha!" and you'd be "whoa that rocks" even years afterwards, you know?

I'm just sayin'
--
$E(X_t|F_s) = X_s,\quad t > s$


To quote Ricky Gervais, by yicky yacky (4.00 / 1) #6 Fri Nov 24, 2006 at 04:48:45 AM EST

"You're talking shit again".


----
24 days left ...
[ Parent ]

Something we excel at by Phage (4.00 / 1) #8 Fri Nov 24, 2006 at 05:06:29 AM EST
IMHO

Founder member Golgafrinchan 'B' Ark
[ Parent ]

If it weren't so rude by yicky yacky (2.00 / 0) #9 Fri Nov 24, 2006 at 05:15:41 AM EST

It should probably go in the site titles with the rest of them.


----
24 days left ...
[ Parent ]

moi? [n/t] by martingale (4.00 / 1) #11 Fri Nov 24, 2006 at 05:30:09 AM EST

--
$E(X_t|F_s) = X_s,\quad t > s$
[ Parent ]

Chris Rock by nebbish (4.00 / 1) #10 Fri Nov 24, 2006 at 05:22:29 AM EST
Can be very funny, but I can't get over the fact that he's a self-important bighead. Puts me off.

I heard a crunk tune where the rapper was boasting about how many women he knows online. God knows what was going on there. Hilarious, especially in the context of the scene's rampant misogyny.

The Aristocrats was OK, but it's a very American thing that joke. They seem to like taking a meme and running with it waaaay beyond it being funny or interesting any more. Best bit of the film was Billy Connoly saying how he always fucks up the punchline and says "the aristocats!". Exactly what I'd do.

--------
It's political correctness gone mad!


Ditto by Phage (4.00 / 1) #12 Fri Nov 24, 2006 at 06:26:35 AM EST
Ricky Gervais. I can't get over the loathing I feel at the sight of him to appreciate the humour. All I want to do is put his head on a pike at the city gates.

Founder member Golgafrinchan 'B' Ark
[ Parent ]

Why? by yicky yacky (2.00 / 0) #13 Fri Nov 24, 2006 at 07:30:31 AM EST

What is it about him that engenders that reaction? I generally only get irritated by comedians when I think they're talentless; if their humour's not to my taste, I just won't watch / listen. I don't think I've ever wanted to put a comic's head on a pike, though.


----
24 days left ...
[ Parent ]

I have seen maybe 2 episodes of the office by Phage (4.00 / 1) #14 Fri Nov 24, 2006 at 07:34:41 AM EST
About the same of Extras.
but everyhwere I go, there is his ugly fizzog leering at me from papers, TV and other shows. I think it's his overweening arrogance for what is a mediocre talent.
His off-sider on the other hand seems interesting but does he get that sort of saturation coverage ?

Founder member Golgafrinchan 'B' Ark
[ Parent ]

The Office was very good by nebbish (2.00 / 0) #16 Fri Nov 24, 2006 at 09:24:57 AM EST
But Extras was self-indulgent and unfunny. I didn't dislike him though until I saw him on Jonathon Ross going on about the art of comedy and not making one single joke. I can remember the days when he took the piss out of that sort of behaviour.

--------
It's political correctness gone mad!
[ Parent ]

It's when by yicky yacky (4.00 / 1) #15 Fri Nov 24, 2006 at 07:44:16 AM EST

he (Rock) starts testifying about politics that it gets a bit irritating because you think, "C'mon; that's clearly not true", but he's hardly alone in that.

As best I can figure, crunk is just a bastardized, Americanized version of Jamaican dancehall (the ragga / bashment stuff). Unlike conventional hip-hop, it gets rid of the funk and rock breaks and the lyrical showboating and concentrates on repetative chants, 909 kickdrums, heavy basslines and that incessant staggered (dum dum — dah - dum dum — dah) break. It's like hip-hop that's been explicitly dance-music-ized. Once you've house-i-fied hip-hop, though, what can you talk about? Shit and skeet, apparently.


----
24 days left ...
[ Parent ]

Mountain by TurboThy (4.00 / 1) #18 Sat Nov 25, 2006 at 05:31:13 AM EST
Denali.
__
You can't fix anything, you can't change anything, so just tell them that everything is A. The Fuck OK. —Rogerborg


Beep bleep chimney | 18 comments (18 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback